🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but very loyal companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have become pawns in a tussle between a defunct facility, public officials and animal rights activists.

But those closest to the whales say the intense discussion over their fate often fails to consider the nuances of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the humans who interact with them daily.

After the federal government prevented the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling attraction near Niagara Falls where they are kept warned to put them down unless the authorities pays for the cost of their care. Canada’s fisheries minister has rejected that request, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their vocal imitation skills, intellectual tasks and communal behavior indicate they are remarkably smart animals – something a former trainer learned personally.

Burgess spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a role that required building relationships of the aquatic animals.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless surprised by the details and quirks in their dispositions. She cultivated a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with different natures.

“One whale chose me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Each transformed the way I perceive bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Her interaction with the whales evolved against a context of increasing societal concern to their confinement.

During her time at the park, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, the orca, died. In all, 19 belugas have died at the park since recent years, a number which the park links to natural mortality, but which campaigners say reflects the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The park did not operate to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand effects of the closure. “Structural materials is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and move about with fragments in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not comment to a request for comment, but in the past claimed: “The whales … obtain far better health care and 24/7 supervision than any person in the UK, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was dismissed from the park in recent months following the death of a beluga, an unwell beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the facility thought particulars of the incident were disclosed to the media and she was let go not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left her and other caretakers in distress. She says the facility’s warning to kill its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “logistically impossible” undertaking, adding any attempts to put down even a individual beluga would require “immense manpower”, vehicles and heavy equipment.

“There’s no way in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She backs requests for the whales to be transferred promptly from the park, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.

In recent months, Canada’s fisheries minister turned down a proposal to export the whales to China.

“To approve the proposal would have meant a ongoing life in enclosure and a return to performance for audiences,” the minister wrote. “As the public, we know that marine mammals are meant for the ocean, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in good conscience authorize an relocation that would prolong the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But Burgess said the official’s statements reveal a broader lack of awareness of the realities of life for belugas raised in confinement.

“The people needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers struggle to find a answer, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have little basis in reality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a important part of sustenance for local populations.

A planned refuge in the province of Nova Scotia, which recently received regulatory clearance, has proven contentious. The future facility, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain positive that it could ultimately represent a permanent resolution for a number of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s consulted, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “merely an experiment” in the whales’ future.

Different voices say the prospect of a protected habitat indicates a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a feasible approach in the near future.

The project lead, head of the initiative, said the location will simulate the cognitive activities and nutrition the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|